##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Narantuya Erkhembaatar Otgonbayar Bataa Erdenebayar Lamjav Narantuya Vandantseren Stephen Karungaru

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of 5G Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) using an entropy-based weighting method to prioritize critical metrics for 5G deployment on existing 4G LTE networks in Mongolia. The proposed methodology quantifies uncertainty and randomness in system performance, assigning objective weights to each KPI based on their contribution to overall information entropy. Among the eight KPIs analyzed in the study, spectrum efficiency emerged as the most critical, with a weight of 0.209. This was closely followed by area traffic capacity at 0.204 and peak data rate at 0.185. By identifying the most significant KPIs, the study suggests that improvements in these areas will positively influence other performance indicators. These results underscore the importance of optimizing these metrics to enhance network performance and user experience. The findings demonstrate that prioritizing specific KPIs can have varied impacts on 5G deployment outcomes, highlighting the significance of a data-driven approach to decision-making in network development. This research provides a practical framework for evaluating and enhancing 5G KPIs, with implications for future 5G deployments from 4G LTE networks in developing countries.

Download Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

5G key performances indicators, entropy weight, correlation coefficient weight, key performance indicators

References
[1] "ITU defines vision and roadmap for 5G mobile development," ITU, Archived from the original on 2020-05-23. Retrieved 2019-04-15. www.itu.int.
[2] "ITU towards 'IMT for 2020 and beyond'," ITU, Retrieved 2021-08-17.
[3] "LTE-M and NB-IoT meet the 5G performance requirements," ITU, 9 December 2018. Retrieved 28 August 2019. Report ITU-R M.2410-0(11/2017).
[4] "Minimum requirements related to technical performance for IMT-2020 radio interface(s) M Series Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services," ITU, November 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2019.
[5] B. Abhik, C. Breno, M.F. Abdur Rahim, Y.-B. Kang and F. Marti, "5G enabled smart cities: A real-world evaluation and analysis of 5G using a pilot smart city application," Internet of Things, vol. 28, 101326, 2024, ISSN 2542-6605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101326.
[6] E.Lamjav, O.Bataa and Ch.Naimannaran, "Optimizing User-Level Packet Scheduling Performance through Optimal CQI-Based Resource Allocation in LTE," ICT Focus, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41-53, 2023. https://doi.org/10.58873/sict.v2i1.41.
[7] C. Hennebert, H. Hossayni and C. Lauradoux, "The entropy of wireless statistics," 2014 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), Bologna, Italy, pp. 1-5, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC.2014.
[8] K. K. Tiwari, E. Grass, J. S. Thompson, and R. Kraemer, "Beam Entropy of 5G Cellular Millimetre-Wave Channels," 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall), Honolulu, HI, USA, pp. 1-5, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCFall.2019.8891530.
[9] R. Maksymiuk, K. Abratkiewicz, P. Samczyński and M. Płotka, "Rényi Entropy-Based Adaptive Integration Method for 5G-Based Passive Radar Drone Detection," Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 23, p. 6146, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14236146.
[10] A. S. Warrier, S. Rubaye, D. Panagiotakopoulos, et al., "Seamless handover in urban 5G-UAV systems using entropy weighted method," in ICMIWC 2021: 15th International Conference on Mobile Internet and Wireless Communication, Rome, Italy, 13-14 December 2021.
[11] F. Ö. Çatak, E. Çatak and O. Elezaj, "5G-SRNG: 5G Spectrogram-based Random Number Generation for Devices with Low Entropy Sources" in COINS, pp. 1–6, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/COINS57856.2023.10189262.
[12] C. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, 1949.
[13] N. Erkhembaatar, "Study on development of information potential," International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST-2013), Mongolia, proceedings, vol.2, pp.380-383, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFOST.2013.6616918.
[14] N. Erkhembaatar and O.Bataa, "Determining ICT indicators using entropy theory," International Conference on Advanced Communications Technology (ICACT-2019), Korea, pp. 217-222, 2019. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT.2019.8702010.
[15] L. Wang, Zh. Qu and W. Yang, "Coupled urbanisation and ecological protection along the Yellow river basin in the context of dual carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 5728, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075728.
[16] N. Erkhembaatar and O.Bataa , "A Study on the evaluation of the ICT development indexes and Some Results," International Conference on Advanced Communications Technology (ICACT-2024), Korea, pp. 84-88, 2024. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT60172.2024.10471911.
[17] Y. Zhu, D. Tian and F. Yan, "Effectiveness of Entropy weight method in decision-making," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pp. 1-5, March 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3564835.
[18] L. Sun, Y. Liu, B. Zhang, Y. Shang, H. Yuan and Z. Ma, "An integrated decision-making model for transformer condition assessment using game theory and modified evidence combination extended by D numbers," Energies, vol. 9, p. 697, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9090697.
[19] H. Qian, H. Wang, G. Wang and Q. Yan, "Research on condenser deterioration evolution trend based on ANP-EWM fusion health degree," Computational Models in Engineering Science, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 679-698, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.043377.
[20] W. Qu, et al., "Entropy-Weight-Method-Based Integrated Models for Short-Term Intersection Traffic Flow Prediction," Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 849, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070849.
[21] J. Xu, C. Wang, X. Yin, and W. Wang, "Digital economy and rural household resilience: Evidence from China," Agricultural Economics - Czech, vol. 70, pp.244-263, 2024. https://doi.org/10.17221/317/2023-AGRICECON.
[22] I. Mihajlović, C. Djevojić and M. Stanković, "Digital skills as a sustainable frame of human resource competitiveness: A comparative approach," Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 4571, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4571.
[23] A. Sutradhar and P. Daspattanayak, ”A regional model for the variability of Agricultural development: evidence from a drought prone region of Rarh Bengal, Eastern India”, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, Springer Nature, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01721-6
[24] N. Erkhembaatar, “Evaluation of Indicators for ICT Development Index using an integrated entropy weighting method”. ICT focus, Volume 2, 1-13, 2023. https://doi.org/10.58873/sict.v2i1.43
[25] M. Shantal, Z. Othman and A.A. Bakar, “A novel approach for data feature weighting using correlation coefficients and min–max normalization” Symmetry, vol. 15, pp. 2185, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15122185
[26] Y. Gan, Q. Duan, W. Gong, C. Tong, Y. Sun, W. Chu, A. Ye, C. Miao and Z. Di, “A comprehensive evaluation of various sensitivity analysis methods: A case study with a hydrological model”, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 51, pp. 269–285, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.031

Citation Format
How to Cite
Erkhembaatar, N., Bataa, O. ., Lamjav, E. ., Vandantseren, N. ., & Karungaru, S. . (2024). A comparison analysis of 5G key performances based on entropy. ICT Focus, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58873/sict.v3i1.46
Section
Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.